|
|
 |
| Titel |
European cultural capital report 2 |
| Auteur |
R. Palmer, G. Richards |
| Plaats van uitgave |
Arnhem |
| Uitgever |
ATLAS, Association for Tourism and Leisure Education |
| Jaar van uitgave |
2009
|
| Reeks |
Report
;
2 |
| Annotatie |
84 p. : afb., fig., tab. ; 30 cm. - Bibliography: p. 71-81
|
|
| Trefwoorden |
Culturele Hoofdstad, evaluatie (vorm), economisch belang, culturele waarde, programmering, manifestaties, Europa, onderzoeksrapporten (vorm) |
Samenvatting
Second in a series of updates to the original Palmer Report, which was produced for the European Commission in 2004. As more and more cities are involved in competing for the ECOC (European Capital of Culture) title, there is also a growing need for information about and evaluation of the event and the host cities. The European Union is giving the ECOC action significant attention. The bidding process, the selection of the short-list of candidate cities and the final selection of the winning city itself attracts substantial political and media attention. From 2009, the European Commission will be allocating increased funds to the ECOC programme, highlighting its importance as a major EU emblematic activity. The report aims to provide essential information for those organising, implementing and evaluating the ECOC. The ECOC programme has changed radically in terms of its aims, scope and scale in recent years. The expansion of the programme to the new Member States of the European Union in particular has brought a whole raft of new countries into the ECOC, and with it new visions and challenges. The 2007 ECOC in Sibiu was the first in the wave of new Member States admitted to the EU after 2004, even though the selection was made under the old rules. This experience offers some interesting pointers for other new participants in the programme. |
|
|
|
 |
|
|